Shyla Crawford
Beat Journal
Week 8
This week I decided to follow a cover story beat. Just what is it that makes a story important enough to make the front page of the paper? I looked at The Washington Post, New York Times, and The Oregonian. More times that not the front page of the paper contained some sort of story pertaining to politics. Even if nothing extremely relevant happened in the election still stories about Clinton, Obama, or McCain filled the front pages. I thought it was interesting that the election is having a constant impact on our news intake. It also made me wonder however if this is the case all the time, or if this is just happening because the time frame we are currently in is around election time. I also noticed that most of the time there was a front page story pertaining to the people the paper is reaching on a somewhat state or local level. This happens I assume in order to draw in the local readers and let them know that the issues happening around them are important and being covered by the news media. The third thing that I noticed is that there is almost always at least a small picture or scoreboard somewhere on the front page in order to get the sports reader to grab the paper and look into what happened in the wide world of sports last night. I thought the papers are doing a great job of covering a variety of things on the front page in order to reach different spectrums of people.
Shyla Crawford
Reading Responses
Week 8
1)
Romenesko this week pointed out a story about John McCain that ran in the New York Times and caused some scuff. The issue over anonymous quotes was brought up and immediately caught my interest. When a story is unproven and has unnamed sources no wonder it gets scrutinized. For a story on a presidential candidate, there needs to be cold hard facts. If those facts are there, what’s the problem with citing and sourcing them? There shouldn’t be a problem with it so do it. It just like in the case at North Western, suspicious quotes cause issues. Don’t make things up, print the truth, and give yourself some credibility. Just like Tom Rosenstiel said, “We’re not in an age of trust-me journalism.”. Heck in this day and age we are in a world of prove-it journalism.
2)
First story on Tuesday from Romenesko pulled me right in. It pertained to Clinton as being all talk and Obama as all walk. This wasn’t so much what got me curious, it was more to the fact that this judgment was coming from University of Washington students. UW was working to get in contact with presidential candidates; this made me wonder, what about Oregon State students? I haven’t heard anything about OSU students trying to get involved in the election and campaigns. There really hasn’t been a lot of campaigning going on around campus either. I was home a couple weeks ago and a man asked me what the campaign was looking like around campus, and the only thing I could even recall was a Ron Paul sign. Why aren’t students getting involved in the politics of elections? I don’t know if students are too busy, not informed, or just don’t care. Maybe if a candidate was to show some kind interest in OSU it would get more students involved, but then again maybe the candidates would call us back, just like Clintons case at UW. But then again the candidates are visiting a lot of college campus around the nation, but how are they choosing which ones to go to? What is it about universities that makes them appealing to candidates to want to go campaign there, and why doesn’t OSU have it?
Shyla Crawford
Beat Journal
Week 7
I spent the week on www.washingtonpost.com looking into sports blogs and columns. I thought it was awesome that a lot of people were covering other issues in sports rather than just who won the game last night. Since sports journalism and broadcasting is my field of interest looking into these blogs and columns certainly opened my eyes. Watching ESPN, as I usually do, just isn’t cutting it. Sure, if you want to know who won the game last night you should check it out, but there are so many other issues inside the wonderful world of sports. For instance, all the steroid talk; we hear something about it hear and there, but there are sports journalist out there covering these issues in depth. As someone wanting to go into this field, I feel like these are the kind of thing we need to know about. We need to be looking into all kinds of sports, from fishing or NASCAR, to soccer and football. It really is something to think about, when you tell someone that you want to go into sports journalist, what kind of sports do you want to cover? Maybe it’s just basketball and baseball or other really fan based sports, but you had better be able to know what kind of fish is on the end of the line when ESPN sends you to cover a fishing tournament.
With all this talk of being a NMC student and having to be a jack of all trades, you better be ready to enter even into your specialty as one. A sport writer for instance needs to specialize in their sports writing, but be a jack of all trades when it comes to knowing and understanding sports from any different spectrum. Overall this jack of all trades idea it going to end up being the key in careers, no matter what we specialize in.
Shyla Crawford
Reading Response
Week 7
1) Another Romenesko story on February 18th was about the decline of newspaper jobs. It so frustrating to read stories like this that are pin-pointing the decline of journalism. Then again I look at it from another point of view and think that just because newspaper employment is declining doesn’t mean other media communication careers aren’t opening up. New media is this whole new world of unexplored places and even though it has a strong journalism base I think it’s imperative to look at how far the world of newspapers is expanding. We don’t only see our news paper in black and white print on the doorstep in the morning, we wake up and click, and there it is; the front page, streaming media, podcasts, broadcasts, everything you could want in the news is right there. We are dealing with a new era of people as well as a new era in technology and that is something the newsroom is going to have to adapt to. It’s happening slowly, but maybe it needs to pick up the pace, and with students like us graduating with the kind of training it takes to do so, I think now is the perfect opportunity for newsrooms to start doing some hiring.
2) Tuesday there was a story in Romenesko that caught my eye about covering the whole story on Britney Spears. I covered entertainment media in a beat journal so I thought I’d check into this. Considering not covering the story because it’s invasive might be somewhat of a novel idea. Britney is sick and she needs space, and the way I see it, what really is it any concern of the whole nation? Why does everyone need to know what’s going on in Britney’s life. People have enough problems of their own maybe they should start worrying about them rather than Ms. Spears. It’s ridiculous that the paparazzi have taken the measure they have and completely invaded her life just for a cover story. Get a life! People that can’t function on a day to day basis without checking into Perez Hilton or E!, need to check their priorities and seriously get a life. This goes for reporters as well, is there really nothing more important going on in the world other than the fabulous life of Britney Spears?